Erm multiclock mpc as clock6/2/2023 ![]() Which is best for rock solid sync? Is the MTP's clock even up for the job, or should I cut my losses and invest in a sync box? And in terms of MMC (e.g. B) I know t has 4 midi out ports, and each port has their own 16channel midi channel. ![]() ![]() I know the midi ports can be used for midi clock and midi notes, I’m wondering while internal sequencer is playing the notes ’m sending will be in sync. I've flicked through the manual and 'audio click to MIDI' through Pedal A on the MTP seems like the most sensible option but the other sync options (SMPTE, ADAT, Word Clock etc.) are really confusing me. I’m talking about sendin BOTH clocks and MIDI sequences at the same time in sync using DAW. Moreover, the actual hardwired connection really is quite simple:Īudio out (audio interface) -> audio in (sync box) -> MIDI out (sync box)īut how would I replicate this with a 828 MK2 FW and a MTP AV USB? As far as I understand the ESI M8U is ‘dumb’ and I can potentially send one clock signal from the Multiclock and then send it to all outputs on the ESI, but this won’t maximise the. While the ERM (and the significantly cheaper Expert Sleepers Usamo) both use a VST plugin to generate the audio click, is there any reason you couldn't just use Ableton's stock metronome to generate the click? I have an ESI M8U and want to output the clock from Ableton to the Multiclock via the plug in, then send the clock to a MIDI splitter to my interfaces. 'Sample accurate MIDI clock' is a phrase that gets banded about a lot from what I understand this is simply the process of converting an audio click into MIDI clock. I've long pined after an ERM Multiclock, described by many as the saviour of all hybrid setups, but given it's also £450 I've turned my attention back to the MOTU gear sitting in my rack. I'm therefore looking for a solution that will allow me to use both the MPC and the DAW in tandem. In terms of audio I multi-track 16 channels into Ableton via 2x 828s, but since I don't sync the DAW and the MPC, each recording has to be done in one take and any overdubs have to be lined up manually. I've got them linked up via network cable, running in Clockworks on the latest build of Catalina, and as a standalone 16x16 MIDI patchbay routing MIDI from my MPC1000 it's absolutely flawless. I shouldn't have bought the usamo? maybe.I recently bought a MTP AV USB and MTP II to allow for more flexible MIDI routing within my hardware setup. ![]() VST, AU and AAX plugins for all major DAWs are provided, or you create your own sync loop with our sample. No drifting involved, everything on the grid. clocking it from the erm multiclock (which is amazing and stable with all my. Synchronisation of the multiclock to a DAW relies on a sample accurate audio clock stream, which in consequence guarantees absolutely tight clock signals with 1 sample of jitter. That is midi and audio streamed by USB, so clearly my main audio interface is not involved, thus it must be Studio One's datastream handling which makes for tight timing. Writing in non standard time signatures is quite difficult on the Mpc. I have tested it with real time Virus Ti rendering and audio aligned exactly spot on with the midi events that triggered the sounds. MPC also enables the inclusion of predicted wind farm performance over a near-term horizon that allows control actions to be planned in anticipation of fast. I say, if you have issues with audio being rendered - not in place - then try studio one. If any one can confirm after testing it out for themselves, I believe that currently Studio One has the best latency compensation and as it seems Midi transfer is "clean", I don't know what's under the hood. I think it is Studio One guys, seriously. Thought about what I said, and before I even do the test, I have had amazingly accurate results without the usamo already, so there really is not point even trying, because it cannot get any more accurate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |